Catalogue Search | MBRL
هل أنت متأكد أنك تريد إزالة الكتاب من الرف؟
{{itemTitle}}
16
نتائج ل
"Klausinger, Hansjoerg"
صنف حسب:
Business Cycles
In the years following its publication, F.A. Hayek & rsquo; s pioneering work on business cycles was regarded as an important challenge to what was later known as Keynesian macroeconomics. Today, as debates rage on over the monetary origins of the current economic and financial crisis, economists are once again paying heed to Hayek & rsquo; s thoughts on the repercussions of excessive central bank interventions. The latest editions in the University of Chicago Press & rsquo; s ongoing series The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, these volumes bring together Hayek & rsquo; s work on what causes periods.
Book
The Nationalökonomische Gesellschaft from its foundation to the postwar period: prosperity and depression
The Nationalökonomische Gesellschaft (NOeG) was founded in June 1918 by a group of young scholars, mostly based in Vienna, as a forum for theoretical debate. Despite the prominent economists involved (e.g. Schumpeter, Mises, Mayer, Spann, Amonn) its activities soon petered out. The relaunch of the NOeG in 1927 originated from the necessity of the two strands of the Austrian school, led by Mayer and Mises, to find some tolerable arrangement; Spann and economists outside the University of Vienna were excluded. Around 1930 the NOeG and Vienna in general proved an attraction for many well-known economists from abroad, and many of the papers presented were printed and cited in first-rate journals. Yet with the emigration of many Austrian economists during the 1930s the NOeG mirrored the general decline of academic economics in Austria and the number and quality of the papers presented decreased. After the Anschluss 1938 the NOeG and its president Mayer were quick in dismissing its Jewish members and in the following adhered to a strategy of inconspicuous adaptation; its formal existence did not lead to any substantial activities. The post-war period was characterized by the restoration of the situation before 1938, with Mayer’s continued presence at the university as well as at the NOeG a case in point. In the end, it led Austrian academic economics into a state of international isolation and “provincialization” much lamented by the émigré economists of the Austrian school.
Journal Article
Academic Anti-Semitism and the Austrian School: Vienna, 1918–1945
The theme of academic anti-Semitism has been widely discussed recently in histories of the interwar period of the University of Vienna, in particular its Faculty of Law and Policy Sciences. This paper complements these studies by focusing on the economics chairs of this faculty and, more generally, on the fate of the younger generation of the Austrian School of Economics. After some introductory remarks the paper concentrates on three case studies: the neglect of Mises in all three appointments of economics chairs in the 1920s; the anti-Semitic overtones in the conflict between Hans Mayer and Othmar Spann, both professors of economics in the faculty; and on anti-Semitism as a determinant of success or failure in academia, and consequently of the emigration of Austrian economists. Finally, we have a short look at the development of economics at the University of Vienna during and after the Nazi regime.
Journal Article
Special issue: 100th anniversary of the Austrian Economic Association and the Future of Health Care Systems
The 2018 annual meeting of the Austrian Economic Association took place from 11th to 12th of May 2018 at TU Wien and was organized by the Research Group on Economics at the Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, TU Wien in collaboration with the Vienna Institute of Demography, ÖAW and the Research Group on Health and Health Policy at the Institute for Advanced Studies. Overall the conference comprised 27 parallel and plenary sessions with a total of 88 presented papers as well as a panel discussion.
Journal Article
HAYEK AND KALDOR: CLOSE ENCOUNTER AT LSE
Friedrich August Hayek and Nicholas Kaldor, both eminent economists, represented two antagonistic approaches, a radical Austrian School-type of liberalism vs an idiosyncratic type of Keynesianism, yet they shared a common starting point in their scientific work at LSE during the 1930s. Three phases will be distinguished in the complicated relationship between Hayek and Kaldor in this period, leading from close collaboration via Kaldor's emancipation eventually to outright conflict, highlighted in particular by the controversy on Hayek's 'concertina effect'. This paper not only carefully investigates these three phases at LSE but also attempts to show the origins of their drifting away from the mainstream of economics.
Journal Article
